IN AN article called "Chief Fiction Officer" in The Economist two weeks past, Joseph Finder, an author and Ivy League graduate, says that his thriller novels, often set in boardrooms and other business environments, contain valuable information about company dynamics:
Business journalism may provide plenty of facts and figures, Mr. Finder
argues, but it seldom gives readers much of a feel for corporate life.
Fiction, in his view, can provide a more accurate picture than anything
found in newspapers or management literature.
Present in the idea that CEOs should look to Mr. Finder's novels for something more than a pleasant thrill ride is the suggestion that these books contain such accurate and nuanced portrayals of the business world that they are capable of eliciting an empathic reaction from their readers.
This idea, that the "feel" for something that a work of fiction creates could be related to the ever-elusive human trait of empathy, is not a novel idea, so to speak. A mere Google search led me to an article in Psychology Today from 2006 about a study describing the link between narrative fiction and empathy. The study showed that
frequent readers of narrative fiction scored higher on tests of empathy and social acumen than did readers of expository nonfiction. A follow-up study showed... People assigned...[a] short story did better on a subsequent social-reasoning task than did those who read an essay from the same magazine.
So perhaps Joseph Finder (and bookworms everywhere) may be on to something. One only needs to think back to elementary and middle school English coursework to notice that many of the novels, besides being quality reading for young minds, are also specifically designed to elicit what Dictionary.com describes as "the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another." From "Number the Stars" to "Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry" we are constantly learning through fictionalized accounts how to relate to people experiencing what we are not.
I may be biased, but I am inclined to extend the hand of friendship between novels and empathy towards poetry. In my post a few weeks ago, I discussed what I thought was a very interesting review of "Poems from Guantanamo: The Detainees Speak" by Dan Chaisson in The New York Times Book Review on August 19th. The reviewer grapples with the effectiveness and honesty of the book. He indicts the collection, callings the poems "the kinds of things sad or frustrated people always have written."
This past week the letters section of the Book Review featured a letter to the editor by Robert Epstein, which responds to Chaisson's commentary, rooting the issue in the knowledge that
even the most liberal Americans have been made so cynical by endless war...that they can no longer even recognize the common humanity in direct statements of injustice and despair.
The point of all this lengthy back-story is that both men are really talking about empathy. For Chaisson, the book fails in cultivating it, whereas for Epstein, the American public (at the hands of the government) fails to produce it. In the pared down and subjective world of poetry empathy also insists on showing its hand.
I would like to end with a poem that I feel is particularly empathic. This seems to be a bit of a conceit, and like saying that I have found poem that is about human emotion, or I have caught a fish in a barrel. But the poems of the Polish poet Anna Swir are, for me, always about empathy. In a poem entitled "She does not Remember," Swir writes about an evil stepmother:
She shudders
Like a clutch of burnt paper.
She does not remember that she was evil.
but she knows
that she feels cold.
In this short poem Swir provides the reader with a visceral experience of cold that permits us to empathize with the most evil fairy tale character of all. Although we lack a complete story, we still understand cold, and that, for us empathic and well-read humans, is enough.
Recent Comments